Airframe
Michael Crichton’s Airframe is a book I really, really wanted to like given my interest in disaster investigation and systemic failure. One of the issues is that I already knew a lot about the topic. But there’s two more.
The first is that has Arthur Hailey meets Herman Melville levels of “look how much I know/research I did.”. The second is that air disaster investigations, while a fascinating topic, are one of the worst main topics for a thriller novel, especially with the setup Chrichton makes. He has to use a large impending sale as a mostly artificial way to increase the stakes, race the clock, and create a conflict (said conflict is: The accident might cost the manufacturer a large order. Oh the huge manatee!) The reality is that disaster investigation is one of the least punitive or conflicting events there is, with the worst being various stakeholders understandably trying minimize their direct fault. Which can be problematic and difficult, but isn’t exactly Jon Land conspirators trying to rule the world.
Spoiler Alert: The problem is that it tries to shoehorn the Aeroflot “kid in the cockpit” disaster in, when a far more interesting and realistic method would be to have even the highly trained pilot making a mistake, especially given that what happened (tried to keep controlling it manually too long, which is what someone with a lot of skill would be more vulnerable to falling for.)
So yes, this doesn’t get off the ground. Metaphorically speaking.


